<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Pete On Rails - Latest Comments in General</title><link>http://peteonrails.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:02:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Visualizing user interaction with your site.</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/09/04/visualizing-user-interaction-with-your-site/#comment-2114105</link><description>I'm glad I took a look at your site and followed your link. I was wondering how this was relevant to a toilet paper company (angelsoft.COM).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Khristian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:02:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You are invited to my open alpha of MyQuotable.com</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/07/21/you-are-invited-to-my-open-alpha-of-myquotablecom/#comment-961904</link><description>Larry: Thank you! I appreciate your help and support. I'd love to hear about ways the service could be useful to you. And, of course, about any bugs you find. Good luck, and happy quoting!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peteonrails</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:50:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You are invited to my open alpha of MyQuotable.com</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/07/21/you-are-invited-to-my-open-alpha-of-myquotablecom/#comment-961275</link><description>That's a fun idea.  I created an account and I'll try to add a few random quotes from whatever I happen to be reading at the time.  I also subscribed to the main RSS feed.  Should make for a nice change of pace when I read the mostly technical in nature feeds I subscribe to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Congrats on launching!  A lot of great ideas never make it that far.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lmarburger</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:13:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There is no reason to climb a ladder if you aren&amp;#8217;t interested in what it at the top.</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/07/06/there-is-no-reason-to-climb-a-ladder-if-you-arent-interested-in-what-it-at-the-top/#comment-926203</link><description>I think you opted out of a lousy job years ago. .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peteonrails</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:39:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There is no reason to climb a ladder if you aren&amp;#8217;t interested in what it at the top.</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/07/06/there-is-no-reason-to-climb-a-ladder-if-you-arent-interested-in-what-it-at-the-top/#comment-925844</link><description>Hmm. Maybe I'm not smart or maybe I just need a pep talk. Ha!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Khristian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:59:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Say what you&amp;#8217;d say if you weren&amp;#8217;t worried about getting fired.</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/07/10/say-what-youd-say-if-you-werent-worried-about-getting-fired/#comment-880886</link><description>Of all the people I know who say it like it is, consquences-be-damned, you're at the top of the list. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peteonrails</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:03:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Say what you&amp;#8217;d say if you weren&amp;#8217;t worried about getting fired.</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/07/10/say-what-youd-say-if-you-werent-worried-about-getting-fired/#comment-880845</link><description>Damn straight!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's nothing worse in the workplace than having to deal with political BS and playing the corporate game.  You know me, I call 'em like I see 'em cuz there's no point in beating around the bush. That just slows things down.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brentmc79</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:57:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GitHub Javascript Badge</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/05/10/github-javascript-badge/#comment-848935</link><description>Some people have modified the badge locally with CSS changes. e.g. &lt;a href="http://ozmm.org/"&gt;http://ozmm.org/&lt;/a&gt; - he's hidden the badge's head and included his own. Might help.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dr Nic</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:02:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DRY controllers: Which Framework do you use?</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/05/07/dry-controllers-which-framework-do-you-use/#comment-1170705</link><description>@mitchell Thanks for your vote. I agree that they're all very good frameworks. Personally, the syntax of "resource_controller" appeals to me. There's a reason I think things need to shake out a little bit: as the rails community grows, there will be more developers who work in teams with others who have different backgrounds. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I were to land on a team with three other developers, it's possible that each of us might know the nuances of a different framework. I'd bet that the team would burn a lot of valuable time picking a DRY controller framework, instead of writing useful code. Then 3/4 of the team would have to spend a few hours learning the new conventions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I predict that one of these frameworks will eventually be folded in to the Rails framework itself. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On an unrelated topic: How do you know Brent?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 23:51:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DRY controllers: Which Framework do you use?</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/05/07/dry-controllers-which-framework-do-you-use/#comment-1170704</link><description>Personally I use resource_controller. Like you Peter it's the one I started with first and have become accustomed too. Seems to me though when it comes down to it you can't go wrong with any of them. I think it's better to have options especially when all the options mean cleaner more efficient code.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mitchell Blankenship</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:23:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ruby Gem - Threaded Collections: Process collections over many threads</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/05/08/ruby-gem-threaded-collections-process-collections-over-many-threads/#comment-1170707</link><description>Hahaha. No: I quit my night job. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Funny thing is, we strongly considered rails for our portal app 3 years ago. Rob talked us out of it. Imagine that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:40:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ruby Gem - Threaded Collections: Process collections over many threads</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/05/08/ruby-gem-threaded-collections-process-collections-over-many-threads/#comment-1170706</link><description>Hmm...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A new blog, with multiple posts in a single day, and a new found interest in Ruby...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you quit your day job or what?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:23:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DRY controllers: Which Framework do you use?</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/05/07/dry-controllers-which-framework-do-you-use/#comment-1170703</link><description>@nathan Incidentally, so do I. The other few have benefits, but I started with m_r and know it the best, so I've stuck with it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:17:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DRY controllers: Which Framework do you use?</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/05/07/dry-controllers-which-framework-do-you-use/#comment-1170702</link><description>I use make_resourceful... but then again, I'm biased.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Weizenbaum</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:50:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Code Highlighting in Typo</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/05/02/code-highlighting-in-typo/#comment-1170701</link><description>LOL. Nice. I'm actually thinking of moving to Dirtylicious, but I wanna move the sidebars to the right. The only weakness in that layout is the left hand nav, which I think is kinda not good for blogs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 14:36:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Code Highlighting in Typo</title><link>http://blog.peteonrails.com/articles/2008/05/02/code-highlighting-in-typo/#comment-1170700</link><description>Are you kidding me?  You give me crap about my theme, and *this* is the theme you're pimping?  C'mon Pete...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I had a nickel for every typo/scribbish blog I've seen, I'd be a rich man.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All jokes aside, I'm not sure how much longer that blog will be around anyway...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 09:52:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>